I'm finally approaching 100% after my bout with some kind of flu bug.

I did some work on the links page . Since I use it as my home page, I need to make sure that it's a correct listing of the sites I frequent. It's not currently.

Salon Magazine's most recent 21st column is a two side look at Yahoo . The half that looks negatively on Yahoo, Boo for Yahoo cliams that Yahoo's directory integrity is compromised by their commercial intentions. That their commercial success and market valuation have led to less improvement of service. It's hard for me to say whether or not this is true. I know that I have rarely been dissapointed by Yahoo's listing.

Are they evolving to give us better service? They are the portal that all of the others have modeled themselves after, but that design has changed little in the last couple of years. I think that this model has grown clumsy in the face of newer Web technologies. There is a lot of room for someone who does it better to come in and compete. I wonder what their vision of the future, aside from being a commerce site, is?

Reuters- United States, Russia Ponder Nuke Danger Of Y2K

Really scary. I was wondering about this a week or so ago. There isn't any easy way to establish how the bug will affect the computer monitors on either side.

E! Online -New "Star Wars" Trailer Coming